User Tools

Site Tools


a_can_of_paint_modifier_part_ii

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
a_can_of_paint_modifier_part_ii [2012/04/18 01:56]
tom
a_can_of_paint_modifier_part_ii [2012/04/18 02:06]
tom
Line 9: Line 9:
 If the gallon can of paint modifier had been listed as being on board in the cargo manifest, why was it not mentioned in the CAB's official report as being known to have been on board? If the gallon can of paint modifier had been listed as being on board in the cargo manifest, why was it not mentioned in the CAB's official report as being known to have been on board?
  
-Mr. Serling, two paragraphs after he writes of the can of paint modifier, quotes from Page 14 of the CAB report, **"The combustible material and source of ignition that started the fire are not known. ​although ​attempts to determine if any passenger had carried any hazardous material aboard the aircraft did not reveal this had occurred, the possibility cannot be ruled out. Such a material, either innocently or with malicious intent, may have been in the possession of a passenger"​**.+Mr. Serling, two paragraphs after he writes of the can of paint modifier, quotes from Page 14 of the CAB report, **"The combustible material and source of ignition that started the fire are not known. ​Although ​attempts to determine if any passenger had carried any hazardous material aboard the aircraft did not reveal this had occurred, the possibility cannot be ruled out. Such a material, either innocently or with malicious intent, may have been in the possession of a passenger"​**.
  
 The fact that the paint modifier, according to Mr. Serling, was listed on the cargo manifest and was known to have existed, lessens the suspicion that the can had been brought on board by a passenger with malicious intent. The fact that the paint modifier, according to Mr. Serling, was listed on the cargo manifest and was known to have existed, lessens the suspicion that the can had been brought on board by a passenger with malicious intent.
Line 15: Line 15:
 Still the question remains as to why a gallon can of a flammable paint modifier was on the aircraft in the first place. Still the question remains as to why a gallon can of a flammable paint modifier was on the aircraft in the first place.
  
 +[[the_parrottsville_crash_site|The Parrottsville Crash Site]]
  
 +[[start|United Flight 823]]
  
  
  
  
a_can_of_paint_modifier_part_ii.txt ยท Last modified: 2014/02/22 13:44 by tom