the_free_fall_victim
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Last revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
the_free_fall_victim [2012/04/18 21:15] tom |
the_free_fall_victim [2013/05/09 10:52] tom |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| It should be mentioned that the passenger who jumped from the left side of the plane did not strike the tail of the aircraft and that he was followed by a dense cloud of smoke. | It should be mentioned that the passenger who jumped from the left side of the plane did not strike the tail of the aircraft and that he was followed by a dense cloud of smoke. | ||
| - | The [[http://ntl1.specialcollection.net/scripts/ws.dll?file&fn=8&name=S%3A\DOT_56GB\airplane%20accidents\websearch\070964.pdf|Civil Aeronautics Board Aircraft Accident Report]] Page 11 states that the free fall victim exited the aircraft through an emergency window over the left wing. A British Aircraft Corporation Memorandum states that it was the "No. 4 window". | + | The [[http://dotlibrary.specialcollection.net/|Civil Aeronautics Board Aircraft Accident Report]] Page 11 states that the free fall victim exited the aircraft through an emergency window over the left wing. A British Aircraft Corporation Memorandum states that it was the "No. 4 window". |
| In a B.A.C Incident Report there is mention that a preliminary check indicated that no nitrates were found in any of the burns suffered by the free fall victim. For example: no explosive residue was found. Also there was no smoke found in his lungs. The C.A.B report, Page 11 states that the free fall man, **" received burns on the hands, face, and neck before death but had only a few carbon particles in his trachea and a carbon monoxide level of 5% in his blood.'** (According to the report, a concentration of less than 10% carbon monoxide is considered negative). **"The upper portions of his clothes were impregnated with soot."** | In a B.A.C Incident Report there is mention that a preliminary check indicated that no nitrates were found in any of the burns suffered by the free fall victim. For example: no explosive residue was found. Also there was no smoke found in his lungs. The C.A.B report, Page 11 states that the free fall man, **" received burns on the hands, face, and neck before death but had only a few carbon particles in his trachea and a carbon monoxide level of 5% in his blood.'** (According to the report, a concentration of less than 10% carbon monoxide is considered negative). **"The upper portions of his clothes were impregnated with soot."** | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| ===Dr. Robert Graham's Findings=== | ===Dr. Robert Graham's Findings=== | ||
| - | The British Aircraft Corporation, with the concurrence of the Civil Aeronautics Board, conducted tests on **"samples of aircraft structure, components, and the free fall victim's clothing."** Dr. Robert Graham Ph.D.,B.Sc., A.R.T.C.,F.I.M presided over the experiments and wrote the final report dated October 19, 1964. | + | The British Aircraft Corporation, with the concurrence of the Civil Aeronautics Board, conducted tests on **"samples of aircraft structure, components, and the free fall victim's clothing."** Dr. Robert Graham Ph.D., B.Sc., A.R.T.C., F.I.M presided over the experiments and wrote the final report dated October 19, 1964. |
| Perhaps the most intriguing of Dr. Graham's experiments were those performed on the clothing belonging to the free fall victim. (Other tests performed on various parts of aircraft furnishings will be discussed as time allows). | Perhaps the most intriguing of Dr. Graham's experiments were those performed on the clothing belonging to the free fall victim. (Other tests performed on various parts of aircraft furnishings will be discussed as time allows). | ||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
| It would appear, therefore, that the source of the liquid whose spurting or splashing caused the scorch mark on Mr. ____'s suit and presumably triggered the cabin fire was a liquid or combustible taken on board the aircraft."** | It would appear, therefore, that the source of the liquid whose spurting or splashing caused the scorch mark on Mr. ____'s suit and presumably triggered the cabin fire was a liquid or combustible taken on board the aircraft."** | ||
| + | |||
| + | Robert Graham gave testimony on January 15, 1965 at the Public Hearing that took place in Knoxville, Tennessee. | ||
the_free_fall_victim.txt ยท Last modified: 2014/01/26 01:10 by tom
Page Tools
