was_sabotage_the_cause
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
was_sabotage_the_cause [2013/08/28 21:26] tom |
was_sabotage_the_cause [2013/08/28 21:28] tom |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| Tests performed in the FBI lab on the free-fall man's clothing and various parts of the aircraft showed that there was no bomb residue found. These results, plus the fact that the aircraft did not explode in the air, as first reported, rule out the possibility of sabotage in the form of someone placing a bomb on the aircraft. | Tests performed in the FBI lab on the free-fall man's clothing and various parts of the aircraft showed that there was no bomb residue found. These results, plus the fact that the aircraft did not explode in the air, as first reported, rule out the possibility of sabotage in the form of someone placing a bomb on the aircraft. | ||
| - | An assassination would have been best facilitated by using a bomb. A bomb would have also eliminated the need for the perpetrator to be present-which brings me to my next conclusion. | + | An assassination would have been best facilitated by using a bomb. A bomb would have also eliminated the need for the perpetrator to be present (on board)-which brings me to my next conclusion. |
| Wouldn't it make sense for a perpetrator to be familiar with the person whom he wished to assassinate and that he would make sure that the person targeted, in this case Senator Walters, actually boarded the plane? | Wouldn't it make sense for a perpetrator to be familiar with the person whom he wished to assassinate and that he would make sure that the person targeted, in this case Senator Walters, actually boarded the plane? | ||
was_sabotage_the_cause.txt · Last modified: 2014/02/08 16:11 by tom
Page Tools
